- Chevy Sprint - American - nice small car, great gas mileage, it only had a 3-cylinder engine. It only lasted about 60,000 miles before it was in such bad shape that I could only sell it for $500. Personal Verdict - it cost me alot of money to keep it running and resale value was terrible. Oh did I mention that it was an automatic transmission and was stuck in 4th gear for the last 30,000 miles that I owned it? I had to go manually from low to 2nd, to drive just to get any type of giddy up on the highway.
- Chrysler Lebaron Blacktop Convertible (1990) - I really liked this car despite it's issues. It had a V6 engine which was like all the power in the world compared to the Sprint. I bought it used when it had 75,000 miles on it. A month after I bought it, I had to spend $2000 on a new transmission. A week after I got it from the transmission company, the engine blew out costing me another $1500 worth of repair. A year after that, the 'new' transmission began slipping again requiring yet another $1000 repair. I owned that car for about 3 years total and put into it more money than I would have making payments on a new car. It was retired back in 2001 when I destroyed it in a car accident.
- Toyota Celica Hatchback (1991) - this was probably my favorite car. I was hesitant at buying a used car with 160,000 miles on it, but I got a great deal on it. I am a Toyota fan for life because of this car. I ran it to a total of 260,000 miles with the original engine and transmission and only had one major repair - an ignition coil. After all that, I sold the car for $500 more than I paid for it.
- Toyota Tacoma Prerunner (2003) - my current vehicle. I've crashed it twice and put a ton of miles on it. I bought this vehicle new and plan on having it run for me for a long time to come. After 2 accidents and 70,000 miles, it still books for about 50% of what I paid for it new. After my 2nd accident in the truck (an accident that happened at highway speed on black ice), my insurance adjuster approved repairs without even looking at it while making the statment, 'it takes an awful lot to total a Tacoma, they're just too tough to break'.
The American automakers don't need more money. They need better vehicles and an open mind to new ideas. If it was your money, would you choose to invest in a company that has a business model that's designed to lose money on every product they sell? Oh wait... it is your money... our money... it looks as if we probably will be paying for cars made by the 'big 3' whether we drive them or not, whether we like it or not.

my main issue with american cars has always been the styling...are american blind to artwork? i think one of the issues is that american cars seem geared to an older set, relying on our heritage that once meant something. its just a different attitude toward car making. i say if we are to run on gasoline, we need to get smart and do small motors that have a turbo. i saw a turboed(stock) volvo stationwagon race a v6 mustang once and win.and probably got the same gas mileage. one of my questions is why has gas mileage not significantly improved in the last 100 years. An orginal model T got similar mileage to our SUV's. so in 100 years we have been into space and taken pictures of other galaxies, but cant figure out how to get 50 mpg? can you say supressed technology?
ReplyDeleteAs I have always said... suppressed technology is a phenomenon that occurs when you have the same large companies. They're already at the top, they're market share is so huge and new start-up companies continuously fade into the dust because of lack of exposure, so there is no competition to drive the machine of invention. This is why the bailouts would in fact be the nail in the coffin for the big 3 because they would be guaranteed an unearned seat at the top of the American Auto Industry not because of their innovation, but because of their size.
ReplyDelete